🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a revised congressional boundary scheme that may create as many as five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disrupting the delicate balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably grouped voters by their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the new maps. It had mandated the state to employ the districts established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Battle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican control. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add a number of additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives decried the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another top House figure said the court had yet again damaged its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.